← home
Project 2025 archive  /  HR 8800 · Section 224
The Energy File · Evidence Desk

A bill to fuse two militaries. Follow what it builds, and who gets paid.

HR 8800 is the 2027 US defence budget. Buried in it, Section 224 ties the United States and Israeli militaries into one shared production line — weapons designed together, built on US soil, stockpiled on Israeli soil. This desk does one thing: it traces each line of the bill to the weapon it funds, the body that weapon meets, and the boardroom that books the profit. Every claim carries its source. Read it and decide for yourself.

BillHR 8800 · NDAA FY2027 · 119th Congress Introduced13 May 2026 · markup 4 June 2026 SponsorRep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) Compiled6 June 2026 · primary-sourced
00 — The mechanism

What Section 224 actually does

Strip the language back and the bill is a plumbing diagram. It connects two states’ weapons industries so that money, parts and designs move between them without a separate vote each time. Here are the four clauses that do the work — open each one.

Section 224 — the US–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative

Names a single official to run it, makes joint projects permanent, and lets US factories build Israeli systems.
+
Verified · chairman’s mark

Section 224 names an executive agent — one official with authority over the whole programme. It turns joint US–Israel projects into “programs of record,” which is the budget term for something funded year on year by default rather than approved fresh each time. And it authorises US co-production: American plants making Israeli-designed weapons on American soil. Three moves, one effect — the cooperation stops being a series of decisions and becomes a standing machine.

House Armed Services Committee — FY27 NDAA chairman’s mark (PDF)

Section 1221 — a US weapons stockpile, on Israeli soil

Extends the War Reserve Stockpile (WRSA-I) authority to 1 January 2029.
+
Verified · chairman’s mark

The United States keeps a reserve of its own munitions physically located in Israel. Section 1221 extends the authority to run it to 1 January 2029. The stockpile sits abroad, drawn on in wartime — which means US weapons can move into a conflict without the visibility a fresh shipment would carry.

FY27 NDAA chairman’s mark (PDF)

Section 1222 — tunnel (subterranean) warfare cooperation

Joint work on detecting and fighting underground. Extended to 31 December 2029.
+
Verified · chairman’s mark

Subterranean warfare is fighting in tunnels and underground spaces — sensing, mapping and striking below the surface. Section 1222 extends joint US–Israel work on it to 31 December 2029.

FY27 NDAA chairman’s mark (PDF)

Section 1223 — counter-drone (counter-UAS) cooperation

Joint work on knocking drones out of the sky. Extended to 31 December 2029.
+
Verified · chairman’s mark

Counter-UAS means countering unmanned aircraft systems — drones. Section 1223 extends joint US–Israel development of anti-drone systems to 31 December 2029.

FY27 NDAA chairman’s mark (PDF)
Put together: one programme, run by one agent, funded by default, with American factories building the weapons and a US stockpile already sitting on the ground abroad.
Reported · analysis

How others read it

Al Jazeera described the bill as advancing “American–Israeli military integration.” The Quincy Institute’s Responsible Statecraft and Democracy Now reported it the same way: not aid to a partner, but the merging of two production systems.

Al Jazeera, 30 May 2026 Responsible Statecraft Democracy Now, 1 Jun 2026
Verified · primary record

The paper trail

The bill was introduced on 13 May 2026 by Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), chair of the Armed Services Committee, with ranking member Adam Smith (D-WA). The committee markup was scheduled for 4 June 2026. The full text is the chairman’s mark, linked throughout this desk.

Congress.gov bill record Rogers & Smith — text release and markup date
01 — The money

Who is paid, and what the payment buys

The bill does not write itself. It is sponsored by people who take money from the industry the bill enriches. This is not hidden — it is filed with the Federal Election Commission. Here is the chain, link by link.

Verified · FEC filings

The sponsor’s money

Rep. Mike Rogers’ own FEC filings show roughly $68,000 raised in Q1 2026, with $176,262 itemised. The filings name the donors. You can read them yourself — this is the primary record, not a summary of it.

FEC — Mike Rogers candidate filings OpenSecrets donor summary
Reported · analysis

The pattern across Congress

NOTUS traced military-contractor campaign contributions to members of Congress and matched them against the votes and bills those members back. The sponsor of HR 8800 is one node in a documented pattern, not an outlier.

NOTUS — military contractors & campaign contributions
The money is filed in public. What is missing is the part where the public gets to say no.
02 — The weapons

What is actually being built — and what it does

Section 224 talks about “technology cooperation” and “programs of record.” This panel translates that into the physical objects the money funds: the targeting software, the missiles, and the nuclear reality the bill never names. Open each one. The point is not to alarm. The point is to show the object plainly, then show the body it meets.

Autonomous and AI targeting

Palantir — the software that decides where to point

A data platform turned targeting system. US Army’s “first AI-defined vehicle.” Used in Middle East conflict.
+
Verified · SEC 10-K

Palantir began inside the US intelligence community — CIA, FBI, NSA. Its software ingests vast streams of data and surfaces patterns: where people are, where they move, what to strike. Its own 2025 annual report (10-K) states it has provided “platforms, products, personnel, and services to support operations in conflict zones, including those associated with the ongoing… Israel and broader Middle East conflicts.” In March 2024 the US Army selected Palantir to build TITAN, described in the filing as the Army’s “first AI-defined vehicle.” As of December 2025 it held $11.2 billion in remaining deal value and $12.3 billion in outstanding contracts.

Palantir Technologies — SEC Form 10-K, FY2025

Shield AI — autonomous drones

$1.5 billion raised in 2025 to build drones that fly and decide without a pilot. Used in Israel and Ukraine.
+
Reported

Shield AI builds drones that navigate and act without a human at the controls. In September 2025 it raised $1.5 billion. Its systems have been used in Israel and Ukraine. This is the kind of “counter-UAS” and autonomous capability Section 1223 funds the joint development of.

Documented in the JP Morgan banking series — see panel 04, The bank

Missiles, air defence, hypersonics

RTX / Raytheon — interceptors, smart weapons, hypersonics

$88 billion in 2025 sales. The co-production target Section 224 is built around.
+
Verified · RTX

RTX’s Raytheon business makes integrated air and missile defence, interceptors, smart weapons, advanced sensors and radars, and hypersonics — weapons that travel faster than five times the speed of sound. RTX reported more than $88 billion in 2025 sales. On 3 June 2026 it booked a $515 million US Navy radar contract. These are exactly the systems Section 224 lets US plants co-produce.

RTX — SPY-6 radar contract, 3 Jun 2026 RTX investor filings

Lockheed, Boeing, Northrop — the rest of the production line

Fighters, bombers, missiles, satellites, 6th-generation aircraft.
+
Verified · company filings

Lockheed Martin: Aeronautics, Missiles & Fire Control, Space. Boeing Defense lists the F-47 stealth fighter, F-15EX, F/A-18 and B-52. Northrop Grumman lists satellites and 6th-generation aircraft. These are the firms whose boards you can examine in panel 03, Who profits — and they are the same client list as the bank in panel 04.

Lockheed Martin governance Boeing Defense Northrop Grumman

The nuclear reality the bill never names

Dimona was built for weapons — and Washington knew in 1960

A declassified CIA report says so plainly. The US sat on it for six decades.
+
Verified · National Security Archive

France built the Dimona reactor in the Negev desert in the late 1950s and early 1960s. A 1960 CIA intelligence report, declassified and published by the National Security Archive in December 2024, stated the site “was for weapons.” Kennedy demanded inspections; Johnson dropped the demand and sold Israel tanks and jets instead. In 1969 Kissinger told Nixon that Israel had pledged not to “introduce” nuclear weapons — and Israel privately redefined “introduce” to mean: do not test, do not deploy, do not tell anyone. That has been the policy ever since.

National Security Archive — 1960 report, Dec 2024

The stockpile, and the uranium under the desert

~90 warheads, fissile material for 100–200, drawn from phosphate rock outside IAEA inspection.
+
Verified

Israel is estimated to hold around 90 plutonium warheads, with fissile material for 100–200. It fields Jericho III missiles with an estimated 4,000 km range and submarine-launched capability. It has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The uranium comes from Negev phosphate rock, extracted at the Negev Phosphates Chemicals Company at Mishor Rotem — a process that runs outside IAEA safeguards. This is the same phosphate-to-uranium route Iraq was invaded over in 2003.

Center for Arms Control — inventory fact sheet, Jun 2025 Wisconsin Project — uranium from Negev phosphate New York Times, 17 Jun 2025

The rule, stated plainly

A US Congressman put the double standard on the record in May 2026.
+
Verified

Iraq was invaded partly over a nuclear programme that never produced a weapon. Iran faces sanctions and strikes over a programme that never produced a weapon. Israel holds roughly 90 confirmed warheads and has faced no inspections, no sanctions, no Security Council resolutions. In May 2026 Rep. Joaquin Castro stated on the record that the US has “voluntarily remained in the dark on Israel’s nuclear weapons for nearly six decades.”

The rule is not: no nuclear weapons. The rule is: no nuclear weapons without Washington’s permission.
Rep. Joaquin Castro, May 2026
Verified · court-documented

Dimona is toxic — and Israel’s own courts have ruled on it

The reactor opened in 1958. The people who built and ran the bomb have been getting sick for decades, and the evidence is not whispered — it is in Israeli court records and settlements. This is what the weapon does to the bodies nearest to it, before it is ever used.

Verified · Times of Israel

168 workers, $22 million, settled to stay secret

In 2017 the state agreed to pay NIS 78 million (about $22 million) to 168 cancer-stricken Dimona workers. A committee headed by a former deputy Supreme Court president found no direct causal link — but recommended the state pay anyway, to avoid having to discuss the top-secret plant in open court. The secrecy was protected; the workers had cancer regardless.

Times of Israel, 18 Sep 2017
Verified · Jerusalem Post

One technician. Five tumours. No protection.

A chemistry technician who worked at the reactor for 32 years was awarded NIS 1 million plus more than NIS 10,000 a month for life. He had developed five cancerous tumours plus bladder and prostate cancer. He said there was no proper supervision and no radiation protection. Other workers searched for uranium across the country protected only by dust masks and eyeglasses.

Jerusalem Post, 19 Sep 2021 Haaretz (via U. Chicago)
Verified · Times of Israel / AFP

An aging core, full of defects

In 2016 a study reported 1,537 defects in the decades-old aluminium core of the Dimona reactor. It has been running since 1958. A 2002 Tel Aviv District Court order forced the plant to disclose radiation data for the first time. This is one of the world’s oldest operating reactors of its kind.

Times of Israel, 1 May 2016 Globes, 17 Jan 2002
Reported · Arms Control Today

What a strike on it would release

Analysts modelling a strike on the aging reactor describe a release of iodine-131 — which concentrates in the thyroid — and cesium-137, which has a 30-year half-life and contaminates ground long-term. Modelled scenarios run from hundreds to over 1,000 excess cancers. Israel has pre-distributed potassium-iodide tablets to the towns of Dimona, Yerham and Aruar.

Arms Control Today, Jun 2008
03 — Who profits

The same names, in the same rooms

Section 224 turns a stream of decisions into a standing machine. A machine has owners. These are the boardrooms that book the revenue — and the people sitting in them. The pattern is not hidden: it is filed with the SEC. Filter by what you want to see.

Verified · SEC filings · the spine

One person sits on a weapons board and the bank’s board at once

Phebe N. Novakovic is Chair and CEO of General Dynamics — one of the largest US weapons-makers — and at the same time a director of JPMorgan Chase, the bank that underwrites the nuclear-weapons industry. The weapons-maker sits on the bank’s board. This is the single hinge that connects this file to the JP Morgan banking work: the money and the munitions share a table.

Arvind Krishna is Chairman and CEO of IBM and a director of Northrop Grumman. The same overlap, one industry over.

General Dynamics proxy (DEF 14A), 2026 — SEC JPMorgan Chase 8-K (annual meeting), 2026 — SEC Northrop Grumman leadership
Follow the spine
See how the same board connects to JPMorgan’s $1.5 trillion plan →

General Dynamics

Weapons · chair sits on JPMorgan board
Submarines, combat vehicles, munitions, Gulfstream jets. Chair & CEO: Phebe N. Novakovic.
Rudy F. deLeonFormer US Deputy Secretary of Defense
Adm. Cecil D. HaneyFormer Commander, US Strategic Command (nuclear forces)
Lt. Gen. Charles W. HooperFormer Director, Defense Security Cooperation Agency — the body that runs US foreign military sales
General Dynamics 8-K, 2026 — SEC GD proxy, 2026

RTX (Raytheon)

Missiles · air defence · the Section 224 co-production target
Interceptors, smart weapons, hypersonics, missile-defence radar. CEO: Chris Calio. Largest owners: BlackRock 10.6%, Vanguard 5.2%.
Gen. Ellen M. PawlikowskiFormer Commander, US Air Force Materiel Command
Robert O. WorkFormer US Deputy Secretary of Defense & Secretary of the Navy
Leanne CaretFormer CEO, Boeing Defense, Space & Security
RTX investor relations (board & ownership)

Lockheed Martin

Missiles & fire control · aeronautics · space
The largest US defence contractor. Chair & CEO: James Taiclet.
Gen. John C. AquilinoFormer Commander, US Indo-Pacific Command
Heather A. WilsonFormer Secretary of the Air Force
Lockheed Martin 8-K, 2026 — SEC

Northrop Grumman

Nuclear systems · 6th-gen aircraft · satellites
Builds the new US land-based nuclear missile (Sentinel) and stealth bombers. Chair & CEO: Kathy Warden. IBM’s Arvind Krishna sits on this board.
Adm. Christopher GradyFormer Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
Adm. Gary RougheadFormer Chief of Naval Operations
Gen. Mark A. Welsh IIIFormer Chief of Staff, US Air Force
Northrop Grumman leadership

Palantir Technologies

AI targeting · the software layer of Section 224
Builds the AI systems that decide what gets targeted. Its 10-K states it supports operations “associated with the ongoing … Israel and broader Middle East conflicts.” JPMorgan was its first private client and owns ~35 million shares.
Alexander KarpCo-founder & CEO
Palantir 10-K (FY2025) — SEC

JPMorgan Chase

The bank · where the weapons board sits
The largest US bank and the #1 underwriter of nuclear-weapons producers. Chair & CEO: James Dimon. General Dynamics’ chair sits on this board.
James DimonChairman & CEO
JPMorgan Chase 8-K, 2026 — SEC
04 — The bank

Who finances all of it

Weapons need a buyer and a banker. The boardroom overlap on the last tab points straight here: JPMorgan Chase. This is the same banking spine traced in the earlier JP Morgan work — set out plainly, with the figures named.

The weapons-maker sits on the bank’s board. The bank underwrites the weapons-makers. Their pensions hold both. It is one loop.

#1 underwriter of nuclear-weapons producers

20 of 24 known warhead-builders are clients. Underwriting reported at about $27.7 billion.
+
Reported · research compilation

JPMorgan has been named the single largest financier of companies that build nuclear weapons. The client list reads like this file’s boards: RTX, Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, Honeywell, L3Harris, BAE, Rolls-Royce, Babcock, Bechtel and General Dynamics — twenty of the twenty-four known warhead-builders. The bank is not adjacent to the arms trade. It is its balance sheet.

Compiled in the JP Morgan banking series — alimcforever.com

Dimon’s $1.5 trillion plan, advised by generals

The Security & Resilience Initiative names defence, munitions, missiles, hypersonics and nuclear among its pillars.
+
Reported · JPMorgan annual report

In October 2025 JPMorgan announced a $1.5 trillion, ten-year Security & Resilience Initiative. Its advisory council is built from military generals and former Secretaries of State and Defense. Its five pillars include defence and aerospace — munitions, missiles, hypersonics — and energy, including nuclear. Jamie Dimon set it out in his own words in the bank’s FY2025 annual-report letter. The bank also hired Heather Zichal, a former Obama climate deputy, which puts a green frame around a plan whose core is weapons.

JPMorgan Chase FY2025 annual report (Dimon letter)

The Palantir loop

JPMorgan was Palantir’s first private client and owns about 35 million shares.
+
Reported · research compilation

The bank that finances the weapons also seeded the targeting software. JPMorgan was Palantir’s first private client and holds roughly 35 million shares. Inside the bank, Palantir’s “Metropolis” was run by Peter Cavicchia III as an employee-surveillance system. The software that decides targets abroad began as a tool watching staff at home.

Palantir 10-K (FY2025) — SEC JP Morgan banking series — alimcforever.com

Pension capture — it is your money

BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street manage about $30 trillion — and own the bank, the software and the weapons-makers.
+
Reported · ownership filings

The three largest asset managers — BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street — together manage about $30 trillion, much of it ordinary people’s pensions. They are the top owners of JPMorgan, of Palantir, and of the weapons-makers (BlackRock holds 10.6% of RTX, Vanguard 5.2%). The loop closes on the public: the retirement savings of ordinary people are invested in the machine this bill funds.

RTX ownership (BlackRock / Vanguard stakes) JP Morgan banking series — alimcforever.com
And the accountability
See why none of this gets audited →
05 — No audit

Built so it cannot be counted

The most important feature of this structure is the one that is missing: a way to check it. There is a precedent for what happens when money moves through this kind of arrangement, and it is recent.

Verified · the precedent

Iraq: over $8 billion, simply unaccounted for

From May 2003 to June 2004 the Coalition Provisional Authority controlled all Iraqi state assets. More than $8 billion went unaccounted for. The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction was set up to find it. It closed in 2013 without recovering the funds, and it never had jurisdiction over the assets seized before the invasion. The money was not lost in the fog of war — the conditions for counting it were never created.

Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) Coalition Provisional Authority
That is not an absence of evidence. That is the systematic elimination of the conditions under which evidence could be produced.
Open question · the parallel

How Section 224 repeats the design

The bill turns joint projects into “programs of record” — funded by default, not approved fresh each year — and authorises co-production drawing on a US stockpile already sitting on Israeli soil. Put those together and you get spending that need not be itemised to the public, weapons that can move without a visible shipment, and a programme run by a single executive agent. The Iraq case shows what that produces: not theft you can point to, but an accounting that was never built. Whether HR 8800 ends the same way is the open question — but the structure is the same structure.

FY27 NDAA chairman’s mark (PDF) — Sections 224, 1221
06 — Sources

Every claim, traceable

This desk is built on primary documents wherever they exist — SEC filings, the bill text itself, court records and declassified intelligence — with reported analysis marked as such. Here is the full list, grouped the way the file is.

Compiled 6 June 2026 for the Project 2025 archive. Verification key: Verified — primary document on record · Reported — single-source or secondary journalism · Open question — contested or not yet provable from the public record. Where a claim could only be sourced to the JP Morgan banking series, it is marked Reported and linked back to that work.